Re: [fsc] New website is up at boost.org

From: Ivan Matek (libbooze_at_[hidden])
Date: 2025-05-13 08:15:30

Hi I agree with what Peter Koch Larsen wrote, but few more comments from my
side:

On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 8:58 PM Joaquin M López Muñoz via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Please take a moment to review the site and provide your feedback
>

   1. I remember vaguely that Boost requires C++11 minimum, but in
   compilers tested C++03 compilers are still listed. If this is not
   intentional maybe remove them.
   2. Library spotlight currently spotlights Config. I presume spotlight
   has a random rotation, I believe it needs some filtering. Not saying that
   Config is not valuable, just that for average visitor of boost website it
   is not an interesting library. Same for Array, Atomic, Enable If, Foreach
   ...  I presume there might be some disagreements on what libraries should
   be spotlighted, but I presume we can get a broad agreement on few libraries
   that definitely do not need to be Spotlighted since they are for Boost devs
   only or have been added to std:: or even core language.