Boost logo

Boost :

From: Ivan Matek (libbooze_at_[hidden])
Date: 2025-05-19 22:35:57


On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 11:13 PM Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> niedz., 18 maj 2025 o 13:29 Andrzej Krzemienski <akrzemi1_at_[hidden]>
> napisał(a):
>
> Probably not the best move performance-wise, but
> this was to check if the libraries can be combined.
>
>
If you mark your hash as avalanching performance should be better.
But in my simple experiments even with that tiny extra boost it still not
even close to boost::hash(that is identity) and extra hashing done by Bloom
library(because boost::hash for uint64_t is not avalanching)...
To be clear evaluating hash performance in bloom filters is very hard, so
do not give a lot of weight to my measurements. :)


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk