> From: David Abrahams [mailto:david.abrahams@rcn.com]
>
> I don't think we have any formal notion of a library maintainer at
> Boost. Perhaps we should? Maybe it we should label libraries
> "stable but
> unmaintained" if their maintainers become unresponsive? Maybe
> unmaintained libraries should be "up for maintenance grabs" after a
> certain amount of time has passed?
>
> Hmm, where have I read these questions before?
>
> -Dave

I second that proposal. Right now some productive outcome of discussions remain hidden in a chain of notes rather than where it really counts; in the code.

[Maybe that could be yet another burden on the broad shoulders of the moderators?]

Bjorn