Yes, that is how we use boost in our projects, but perhaps that isn't relevant to how files within boost refer to each other? Now that I've thought about it a little more I'm starting to think that it does make sense for boost files to include other boost files using the "" syntax.

-----Original Message-----
From: David B. Held [mailto:dheld@codelogicconsulting.com]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 5:50 PM
To: boost@lists.boost.org
Subject: [boost] Re: #include <boost/...> to #include "boost/..."
transition?

"Bohdan" <warever@mail.i.com.ua> wrote in message
news:ahi698$cbu$1@main.gmane.org...
> [...]
>     I do not know whether standart has something about precompiled
headers,
> most probably not. Anyway i wish to include boost headers in <...> for
this
> reason.

Well, if it comes down to a vote, I would prefer <> myself, and that is how
I include Boost headers currently.

Dave

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost