David Abrahams ha escrito:

Joaquín Mª López Muñoz <joaquin@tid.es> writes:

> Something like
> (admittedly a little long, but cutting anything will lead to confusing
> interpretations.)


This can only be misinterpreted by someone who doesn't know the
language terminology, it seems to me.

There is IMHO a deviant interpretation of your proposed name, namely that
POINTER_TO_MEMBER refers to a type instead of an non-type argument,
like in:

template<typename T> struct foo{...};

foo<int A::*> f; // instantiated with a type

Other than this, the name seems OK to me.

Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo