Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] [boostbook][patch] patches to trunk
From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-15 14:03:27
On Thursday 11 October 2007 14:20 pm, Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> On Thursday 11 October 2007 11:17 am, Rene Rivera wrote:
> > I don't you want to do this. Or at least you want to really test the
> > standalone build (there's a Jamfile.v2 that goes with it) *and* talk to
> > Volodya about the changes. Personally I would prefer the approach of
> > mutating the XML to fit the context as the XSLT at the bottom of
> > docbook.xsl does.
>
> Allright, here's an alternate patch to standalone.xml. It should look the
> same as the old standalone version (I built it and it looked okay). It
> uses xpointer to reparent the children of the top-level <section>s into
> <chapter>s (or <appendix> as the case may be).
>
> It there are objections to this version too, I'll just punt and put the
> build docs patches in a ticket in trac
Hmm, is it allright for me to apply the second version of my patch to the
boost.build docs? I tried putting the patch in trac, but it thinks it is
spam:
Submission rejected as potential spam (Maximum number of external links per
post exceeded, Akismet says content is spam)
-- Frank
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:40 UTC