Re: [Boost-docs] Doc build failure... For bjam.

Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] Doc build failure... For bjam.
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-16 09:22:23

Beman Dawes wrote:
>> Daniel James wrote:
>>> 2008/10/11 Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]>:
>>>> Thank you for suggesting that!
>>>> <http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/49287>
>>>
>>> I'm glad you've got it working. It looks like we really need someone
>>> to take responsibility for maintaining the windows boostbook build
>>> tools or future problems will only be caught during the bjam release
>>> process.
>>
>> Agreed. Who is the logical person to take responsibility?

I have a working Win32 setup as well, as for maintaining it that's harder: 
not least because it's hard to tell when it's broken!  The doxygen 
integration seems to be particulary flaky: often reporting success when it 
in fact failed, or at least mangled the output :-(

John.