Re: [Boost-docs] Making Boost Doc builds more robust

Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] Making Boost Doc builds more robust
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-02 18:54:43

Daniel James wrote:
>>> One other thing I've noticed is that quickbook doesn't always exit
>>> with an error code if the markup is invalid - things I particularly
>>> noticed were xinclude/include/import not failing if the specified
>>> file name is invalid.
>>
>> This was the problem was had in the last release. Some of the
>> documentation wasn't included but nobody noticed until the last
>> minute because the build succeeded.
>>
>> There's already a ticket:
>> https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1399

OK, I have a "quickbook-fail-test" working so we can now test things that 
should be errors in quickbook.  Any pointers on how to best address the 
ticket?

Cheers, John.