Re: [Boost-docs] Handling Doxygen command @par

Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] Handling Doxygen command @par
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-24 01:06:36

Daniel James wrote:
> On 24 February 2010 00:44, Mateusz Loskot <mateusz_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Daniel James wrote:
>>> I just checked in a quick hack to get it to display as normal text.
>>> I'll try to do something better soon. Although, the html that doxygen
>>> normally generates for it is pretty odd, an unordered list inside a
>>> definition list. I'll try to do something closer to the intent.
>> Perhaps you could suggest a replacement for @par with @li commands
>> to get such list generated properly, without any odd HTML output?
>> If there is a close equivalent, then I could just fix it on my side
>> as it would be probably easier than hack Boost engine.
> 
> Oh no, it's probably fine for generating boostbook. I was looking at
> the output from doxygen documentation for guidance and that's what's
> weird. I think '@par' is equivalent to a 'formalpara' in docbook,
> which makes more sense, so that should be okay.

I see. Great, thanks!

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org