Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] Translating Doxygen defgroup to Quickbook
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-28 17:39:01
Daniel James wrote:
> On 28 February 2010 16:51, Mateusz Loskot <mateusz_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> However, before I'll adopt it for Boost Geometry, I'd like to know if
>> there is any better or let's say recommended way to achieve this.
>> Perhaps Quickbook has got native support of Doxygen defgroup, etc.
>
> FWIW, quickbook doesn't have any support for doxygen. Both quickbook
> and the doxygen documentation is converted into boostbook, which is an
> extension of docbook. This is then all combined together to generate
> the final documentation.
My bad, I imprecisely used quickbook but I meant boostbook or
quickbook + boostbook.
> At the moment Boostbook reference documentation is very much organised
> by header. It's quite heavily inspired by the C++ specification style.
Yes, I understand.
> It would be possible to add alternative ways to organise the reference
> documentation, but it'd be a fair amount of work.
Right.
So, I can handle the grouping as it is done in the Boost Asio docs.
Best regards,
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:41 UTC