Re: [Boost-docs] Sphinx integration

Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] Sphinx integration
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-16 13:14:58

on Thu Oct 13 2011, Mateusz Łoskot <mateusz-AT-loskot.net> wrote:

> On 13 October 2011 03:16, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 10/11/2011 8:57 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>
>>> Now, regarding the implementation of such translator:
>>> - is there anything already available in current doc tools in Boost,
>>> Vault,...?
>>> - if not, where it should go? separate cmd line tool like quickbook?
>>> - what's best way to parse XML for BoostDoc for ? libxml, Boost.Tree,
>>> Spirit?
>>
>> <http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/tools/build/v2/tools/doxproc.py>
>>
>> And there's support for using that already in the b2 "doxygen.jam" file
>> <http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/tools/build/v2/tools/doxygen.jam>:
>>
>> # Which processor to use for various translations from Doxygen.
>> feature.feature doxygen.processor : xsltproc doxproc : propagated implicit ;
>
> Thanks, I will take a look.
>
>> And of course the currently used xsltproc translator. Is this what you are
>> wanting? Or did I not understand the thread?
>
> The latter is also possible. The more I'm thinking about the initial
> issue, the more I'm convinced about its utopian nature.

Hi Mateusz,

I've been intending to ask what you mean by this.  I do hope you're not
giving up.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com