Re: [Boost-docs] The beauty of LATEX

Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] The beauty of LATEX
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-18 01:45:21

AMDG

On 10/17/2011 06:00 PM, Joel de Guzman wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 8:24 AM, Daniel James wrote:
>> On 18 October 2011 00:37, Joel de Guzman <joel_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Non-
>>> Dox users, like me and Rene, should not be forced to have
>>> Dox features down our throat.
>>
>> When have I done that?
> 
> You haven't done anything like that. Please don't take that
> as an accusation.
> 
> What I meant is that quickbook should be free of Doxygen-isms.

Technically funcref, classref, etc. are
BoostBook-isms.  Doxygen is just a
convenient way to generate the BoostBook
reference.

> Anything tool-specific should not really be intrinsic to the
> language. quickbook can and should be target agnostic. It is
> very possible to achieve target-specific features through
> external Qbk template libraries.
> 

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe