Re: [Boost-docs] A downside of qbk

Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] A downside of qbk
From: Bo Jensen (jensen.bo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-06 20:07:30

On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I've been meaning to point out the difference between
>
> https://github.com/boost-lib/parameter/blob/master/doc/index.rst
> https://github.com/boost-lib/spirit/blob/master/doc/introduction.qbk
>
> As long as qbk is a full-fledged programming language, we may never be
> able to expect better.  Any ideas?  Does anyone think we can possibly
> convince GitHub to include a qbk processor?

Have no idea if that's possible, but damn it would be nice !

>
> --
> Dave Abrahams
> BoostPro Computing
> http://www.boostpro.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-docs mailing list
> Boost-docs_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-docs
>