Re: [Boost-docs] A downside of qbk

Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] A downside of qbk
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-06 21:21:04

on Sun Nov 06 2011, Dave Abrahams <dave-AT-boostpro.com> wrote:

> I've been meaning to point out the difference between 
>
> https://github.com/boost-lib/parameter/blob/master/doc/index.rst
> https://github.com/boost-lib/spirit/blob/master/doc/introduction.qbk
>
> As long as qbk is a full-fledged programming language, we may never be
> able to expect better.  Any ideas?  Does anyone think we can possibly
> convince GitHub to include a qbk processor?

Actually, I just had an idea: make sure that qbk is an extension of
markdown syntax, which IMO is winning the wiki-like syntax wars.  Then
we could get reasonable rendering for many things even where there's no
qbk support at all.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com