Re: [Boost-docs] Sample TR2 library proposal using Quickbook

Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] Sample TR2 library proposal using Quickbook
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-01-09 02:29:27

on Fri Jan 06 2012, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot-AT-gmail.com> wrote:

> On 1/6/2012 11:01 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>
>> on Fri Jan 06 2012, Rene Rivera<grafikrobot-AT-gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/5/2011 8:23 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:
>>>> Rene Rivera<grafikrobot<at>   gmail.com>   writes:
>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/30/2011 10:09 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:
>>>>>> Rene, what did you do to cause the stylesheet to be inlined?
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, I don't think I did for the version generated from quickbook. I made
>>>>> a separate version for the one sent to the committee. It should be
>>>>> possible.. Although it might take some XSLT to do it.
>>>>
>>>> Thinking a bit more about using Quickbook to generate non-Boost documents, there
>>>> are really two separate issues:
>>>>
>>>> * Using inline styles.
>>>
>>> More on this as I've gotten around to messing some more with the tree
>>> proposal..
>>>
>>> I have made a change to the BoostBook XSLT code that lets me style
>>> with the CSS to get the look&feel of the standard documents.
>>
>> Which ones?  Do you mean proposals, or working papers?  For what it's
>> worth, proposals do not have a uniform style.
>
> I mean proposals.. And I'm aware there's no uniform style. But the
> idea of making it have the look&feel of the working papers 

You just confused me again.  Are you making it look like other
proposals, or like working papers?

> is that it hopefully makes it easier for the people who are accustomed
> to reading the standard and working papers.
>
> Rene.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com