Re: [ublas] Aliasing for += and -=

From: christopher diggins (cdiggins_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-17 20:47:28

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Stevens" <mail_at_[hidden]>
>
>> I'd like to point how few lines of code are in the implementation I
>> supplied (when compared to the ublas monstrosity), and the fact that 
>> there
>> are many optimizations which weren't done (which is why I kept calling it 
>> a
>> "naive" implementation).
>
> The naive implementation is not faster! I have appended results for the
> 'bench1 100'. This compares uBLAS dense vector matrices with naive
> implementations.

You can't refute my results by posting results from an entirely different 
set of classes! Clearly not all 'naive' implementations are created equal 
are they?

- Christopher Diggins