Boost logo

Ublas :

From: Michael Stevens (mail_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-19 13:05:20

On Friday 19 August 2005 14:46, Neal Becker wrote:
> I have done a quick benchmark on this. It appears that in at least one
> simple case I tried, it didn't make any difference to use this patch. I
> suppose gcc-4.0.1 is smart enough to eliminate the destruction of Complex
> values without the optimization of using std::_Destroy. Therefore, I
> withdraw this part of the patch.

Thanks for the benchmark info. Always good to have a few data points.