|
Ublas : |
From: Gunter Winkler (guwi17_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-17 05:02:01
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 01:08, wangxiaoyi wrote:
> function same_impl_ex() is just one issue. Actually I have given a
> specialization as yours and it compile successfully. However, ublas use
> size_t(-1) as a special value for checking the index value, which will
> cause a assertion fail at run time. There seems no graceful way to solve
> this problem.
Can you post a list (and a small example) that shows the problems? This makes
it easier to fix it.
mfg
GUnter