Re: [ublas] bypass construction interest?

From: Gunter Winkler (guwi17_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-05 03:41:10

On Saturday 03 February 2007 17:05, Neal Becker wrote:
> OK, here is a try:
> (note, this also includes the proposed serialization patch)

I think we should split the patch in 2 parts (and remove the serialization 
patch)

Part 1: 
- all changes from new to alloc.construct(..) and similar.
- I'd like to shift the loop + consruct to 
detail::uninitilized_fill_a(first, last, value, alloc) 
(which can later be forwarded to the STL or adopted to different compilers)

Part 2: 
- the trivial constructor check that completely skips the initialize

Is this reasonable?

mfg
Gunter