Re: [ublas] Getting bit by ormqr.hpp

Subject: Re: [ublas] Getting bit by ormqr.hpp
From: Karl Meerbergen (Karl.Meerbergen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-16 10:37:07

Well, following the naming convention that we have adopted earlier we
would have to introduce two different functions:
ormqr for real matrices and unmqr for complex matrices where unmqr can
also be used in the real case, but then it is a synonym for ormqr.
In this situation, there is a clear separation between real and complex
and we do not have to provide a templated function (I think).

Best,

Karl

Jeremy Conlin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Karl Meerbergen
> <Karl.Meerbergen_at_[hidden]
> <mailto:Karl.Meerbergen_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
>     Correction done.
>
>     Karl Meerbergen wrote:
>     > You are right of course. This should be corrected.
>     >
>     > Thanks for spotting this
>     >
>     > Karl
>
>
> Thanks for the quick update.  After thinking about this for an hour or
> so I have another idea.  What about testing something like:
>
> if( transpose_flag != 'N' ){
>     transpose_flag = 'T';    // For single or double precision
>     transpose_flag = 'C';    // For complex
> }
>
> This would allow a templated function to use the same flag for both
> complex and non-complex types, and have the binding sort it out.
>  Would this bring bad karma?
>
> Thanks again,
> Jeremy
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ublas mailing list
> ublas_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
>