Subject: Re: [ublas] MUMPS and latest traits
From: Karl Meerbergen (Karl.Meerbergen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-02 10:48:56
Thomas Klimpel wrote:
> Karl Meerbergen wrote:
>> Good to know this. What is the reason of this move?
> There was some discussion about the structure of the sandbox repository, and David Abrahams (http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2009/02/149007.php) wrote:
>> We do?
>> IIUC there are still sandbox/boost and sandbox/libs, which are the
>> problem I wanted to address.
> Now it shouldn't be too difficult to move "sandbox/boost/numeric/bindings" to "sandbox/numeric_bindings-v1/boost/numeric/bindings" and "sandbox/libs/numeric/bindings" to "sandbox/numeric_bindings-v1/libs/numeric/bindings", and because I don't want to cause problems to anybody...
> I know that this will invalidate existing links to the bindings-repository, but I hope that this is not too bad. I will have to write an announcement to the list anyway, and wait a bit (2 weeks?) for protests, before actually moving the repository.
I have copied include and tests to numeric_bindings. The mumps
regression test that we discussed last week works for me in