Re: [ublas] Test results for getri and getrf

Subject: Re: [ublas] Test results for getri and getrf
From: Rutger ter Borg (rutger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-09 07:37:02

Thomas Klimpel wrote:
>
> I think "integer_type" or "int_type" would sound sufficiently
> natural to me. However, note that Multi_Array and uBlas burry such
> typedefs deep into their namespaces, such that no conflicts with other
> typedefs occur. So the actual type would be
> boost::numeric::bindings::int_type.

We would also continue to need another int-type defined for some Fortran
platforms, right? To avoid confusion on that side, we could end up with

boost::numeric::bindings::int_type
boost::numeric::bindings::fortran_int_type

Kind regards,

Rutger