Re: [ublas] [bindings][traits] is_vector, is_matrix

Subject: Re: [ublas] [bindings][traits] is_vector, is_matrix
From: Karl Meerbergen (karl.meerbergen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-10 16:59:51

In fact, what I wanted to say is that it might perhaps be better to stay 
in line with http://www.cs.kuleuven.be/~karlm/glas/tw506-revision.pdf 
and have some meta function of the style

is< BindableVector, V >
is< BindableMatrix, V >
is< BindableSparseMatrix, V >

or alternatively

BindableVector<V>
BindableMatrix<V>

Karl

Karl Meerbergen wrote:
> Rutger,
>
> Where do you need this?
>
> Karl
>
>
> Rutger ter Borg wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> for some cases in bindings development the metafunctions is_vector<T> 
>> and
>> is_matrix<T> would come in handy. Is it OK if I add template
>> specializations for this to most headerfiles under traits at
>> sandbox/numeric_bindings?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Rutger
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ublas mailing list
>> ublas_at_[hidden]
>> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
>>   
>
> _______________________________________________
> ublas mailing list
> ublas_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
>