Re: [ublas] performance vs. Eigen2

Subject: Re: [ublas] performance vs. Eigen2
From: Rhys Ulerich (rhys.ulerich_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-24 23:23:43

I can't speak to currently fair and accurate.  I do believe the ublas BLAS
bindings would allow you to use GOTO or Intel MKL as a backend for serious
crunching should they turn out to be optimal.

- Rhys

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Curtis Gehman <csgehman_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I'm still new to uBLAS.  Today I discovered Eigen2, another C++ linear
> algebra library, that claims to be significantly faster.  The benchmarking
> don't appear to be ancient (2008-08).  It seems like Eigen2 gets most of the
> advantage from using SSE2 (something about which I know very little).  Is
> this comparison (still) fair and accurate?
>
> http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Benchmark-August2008
>
> Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ublas mailing list
> ublas_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
> Sent to: rhys.ulerich_at_[hidden]
>