Re: [ublas] [bindings] Some thoughts

Subject: Re: [ublas] [bindings] Some thoughts
From: Peter Gottschling (pgottsch_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-18 13:56:45

Dear Jesse and Rutger,

I am glad to hear about your serious interest of providing bindings for
MTL4.  If I can help you with this please let me know.  Karl
(Meerbergen) and I decided a long time ago to unify the interfaces of
MTL4 and GLAS for the sake of seamless interoperability. 
Unfortunately, we never found the time to realize this plan.  

Regarding Rutger's concern about the stability, it is true that I
occasionally change some internals for better performance or a cuter
interface but that did not affect basics like memory layout.  If there
were some significant changes we can still adapt the traits.  This
said, it is probably best storing them in a MTL4 subdirectory, so we
can provide a consistent versioning. 

Cheers,
Peter

Rutger ter Borg schrieb:
> Jesse Perla wrote:
>
> > I think that makes a lot of sense until we can get a high level of
> > coverage
> > of the routines.  I would also love to see traits for MTL4 if that is
> > possible since it seems to be a very active library.
> >   
>
> It's quite easy to provide traits for mtl4. It's even easier if their code 
> base would have been stable :-) What classes would you need traits for?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rutger
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ublas mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
> Sent to: [e-mail]


-- 
Peter Gottschling, Ph.D.
mail: [e-mail]
www:  www.osl.iu.edu/~pgottsch