Re: [ublas] Numeric traits for ublas bounded_vector and matrix

Subject: Re: [ublas] Numeric traits for ublas bounded_vector and matrix
From: Rutger ter Borg (rutger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-24 04:20:16

Jesse Perla wrote:

> Jesse Perla <jesseperla <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> > proposing a static_matrix and static_vector to ublas would be the way
>> > (if you want to stick to boost/ublas for your container needs)?
> 
> Wait a sec..... have I been a complete idiot for a full year?  Should I be
> using c_vector and c_matrix instead of the bounded_vector bounded_matrix?

Hey Jesse,

AFAICT, the c_matrix/c_vector stuff also has dynamic sizes (see the size1_ 
and size2_ members). In terms of behaviour, I think it's identical to the 
bounded_ stuff.

Cheers,

Rutger