Subject: Re: [ublas] New uBLAS maintainer
From: Jesse Perla (jesseperla_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-22 09:14:33
Rutger ter Borg <rutger <at> terborg.net> writes:
> I've been looking into supporting Multi_Array in the bindings, too. So far,
> to me, it's the only known container which has a run-time-determined data-
> order. The bindings, like all supported containers so far, assume a compile-
> time-determined data-order. I'll need to go through some of the internals to
> see how it can be fitted in. I guess it can, and I actually like the case:
> it is another test for the versatility of the new traits system.
Hmm... I didn't think about that. You are right, it could provide a good test
of the versatility of the bindings.
On the other hand, A first draft could only support C style ordering,
and have a runtime assert that the storage_order == c_storage_order()