
Ublas : 
Subject: Re: [ublas] matrix_row fails with symmetric matrix
From: David Bellot (david.bellot_at_[hidden])
Date: 20100518 02:45:05
Interesting behaviour indeed. I have a partial copy of the vector too when
using std::copy.
However may I suggest that way:
vect = row(mat,0);
std::cout<<"is this the first row?\n"<<vect<<std::endl;
vect = row(mat,mat.size1()1);
std::cout<<"is this the last row?\n"<<vect<<std::endl;
Using the free function row, it works pretty well.
David
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 23:03, Andrea Cassioli <cassioliandre_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I've just experienced a quite silly bug. I'm currently using a
> symmetric matrix to perform some linear algebra calculations, after
> that I need to copy one row at the time in a bigger vector. Till now I
> have been performing row copying by means of simple handmade loops.
>
> Now I would like to clean the code, so I 've decided to use matrix_row
> adaptors to iterate among all matrix row and use std::copy to perform
> the copy operation.
>
> It sounds clean and simple but surprise it does not work! I've write
> down a very simple example, which is attached to the message. In fact
> the copy is performed accessing the underlying triangular matrix used
> to store the symmetric one.
>
> I'm pretty sure I'm doing something wrong, but I would expect the
> matrix_row adaptor to behave as a normal vector, that is I would like
> to play with it seamlessly.
>
> Am I wrong or it is a bug??
>
> Best Regards,
> Andrea Cassioli
>
> _______________________________________________
> ublas mailing list
> ublas_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
> Sent to: david.bellot_at_[hidden]
>
 David Bellot, PhD david.bellot_at_[hidden] http://david.bellot.free.fr