|
|
Ublas : |
Subject: Re: [ublas] rvalue reference and move
From: Nasos Iliopoulos (nasos_i_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-22 13:54:52
> The example showed in that link does not entirely eliminate
> temporaries. Consider the expression
Just to make myself clear, when I meant eliminating temporaries, I meant get read of the need for noalias calls in ublas. (as I think you also suggest)
Best
Nasos
> Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 01:40:48 +0800
> From: sth4nth_at_[hidden]
> To: ublas_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [ublas] rvalue reference and move
>
> Nasos,
> The example showed in that link does not entirely eliminate
> temporaries. Consider the expression
> x = (a+b)+(c+d);
> here we construct two temporaries and one is wasted.
>
> However, I don't think we should re-implement the operators, since
> those are already handled by expression template. I think only move
> constructor and move assignment operator should be added for
> container of uBlas.
>
> Best,
> Mo
>
> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Nasos Iliopoulos <nasos_i_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Mo,
> > in your compile options use BOOST_UBLAS_MOVE_SEMANTICS.
> >
> > (i.e. in gcc that would be -DBOOST_UBLAS_MOVE_SEMANTICS)
> >
> > I would like to make a couple of changes in the bounded types and push the
> > idea to make the move_semantics default, as it seems all compilers support
> > copy elision and even if they don't there is no penalty.
> >
> > see also:
> > http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_43_0/libs/numeric/ublas/doc/options.htm
> >
> > There had been some discussion in the past and I see that with the new
> > standard we will be able to go even further in totally eliminating
> > temporaries.
> > Take a look at this also:
> > http://cpp-next.com/archive/2009/09/making-your-next-move/
> >
> > Best
> > Nasos
> >
> >> Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 15:39:08 +0800
> >> From: sth4nth_at_[hidden]
> >> To: ublas_at_[hidden]
> >> Subject: [ublas] rvalue reference and move
> >>
> >> Since gcc 4.4 4.5 and VC2010 all support the rvalue reference, I think
> >> it will be beneficial to utilize this feature to implement the move
> >> semantic for those containers of uBlas. Is there any plan for this or
> >> anyone doing this?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Mo
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ublas mailing list
> >> ublas_at_[hidden]
> >> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
> >> Sent to: nasos_i_at_[hidden]
> >
> > ________________________________
> > The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
> > Get started.
> > _______________________________________________
> > ublas mailing list
> > ublas_at_[hidden]
> > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
> > Sent to: sth4nth_at_[hidden]
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ublas mailing list
> ublas_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
> Sent to: nasos_i_at_[hidden]
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccount&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4