Re: [ublas] Symmetric Matrix Adaptor Strangeness

Subject: Re: [ublas] Symmetric Matrix Adaptor Strangeness
From: Rob Patro (rob.patro_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-07 10:12:38

Nasos,

  Indeed, these did help!  Though I agree with those posts that the
  iterator documentation needs to be more explicit.  At least to me,
  this implication (the symmetric adaptor behavior) of not using a
  const iterator was not at all obvious.  Thanks again for the help!

Cheers,
Rob

On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 09:39:13AM -0400, Nasos Iliopoulos wrote:
> 
> Rob,
> I think those posts may help,
> 
> http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/ublas/2010/05/4269.php
> http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/ublas/2010/06/4326.php
> 
> Best
> Nasos
> 
> 
> > Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 15:39:20 -0400
> > From: rob.patro_at_[hidden]
> > To: ublas_at_[hidden]
> > Subject: [ublas] Symmetric Matrix Adaptor Strangeness
> > 
> > Hello all,
> > 
> >   I've still made no headway on the bug I posted previously that deals
> >   with iterating over the non-zero entries of a symmetric adapted
> >   sparse matrix.  Clearly there seems to be an issue with the adapting
> >   of the iterators when the underlying type is a sparse matrix.  Does
> >   anyone have any ideas?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Rob
> > _______________________________________________
> > ublas mailing list
> > ublas_at_[hidden]
> > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
> > Sent to: nasos_i_at_[hidden]
>  		 	   		  
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox.
> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2

> _______________________________________________
> ublas mailing list
> ublas_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
> Sent to: rob.patro_at_[hidden]