Re: [ublas] [bindings] Use of fortran_int_t

Subject: Re: [ublas] [bindings] Use of fortran_int_t
From: Rutger ter Borg (rutger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-14 14:52:02

Marco Guazzone wrote:

[snip]
> 
> So is it safe to include "detail/config/fortran.hpp" in client code?
> The adjective "safe" is to be intended as "stable" since this include
> is in the "detail" part of the library and hence possibly subjected to
> changes.
>
[snip]

I guess this will be a recurring question / theme. Perhaps we could 
introduce traits for it? If so, what would be a good name / interface? We 
could then add it to the bindings tld.

Cheers,

Rutger