[boost] Re: timer classes

From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-07-01 07:51:59

> Dave Abrahams wrote:
> 
>> 2. why the implementation is stored as a reference. While the code looks
>> correct, reference members are a dicey proposition in general, and hard to
>> get right.
>
> Why ?

Because the default assignment semantics are seldom what you want.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/boost
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications