[boost] Re: call_traits aka parameter_traits

From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-11-29 09:27:37

At 04:22 PM 11/28/99 -0800, Darin Adler wrote:

>> Comments appreciated!
>
>I believe std::size_t is superior to int here:
>
>    template< typename T, std::size_t sz > struct call_traits< T[sz]
>
>        {typedef T * const type; enum { by_value = true }; };

Changed.

>What happened to the std::swap specialization?

Cut-and-paste error.  Fixed.

We need a test program that demonstrates and exercises empty_member.

Steve?  Darin?  Anybody?

--Beman