[boost] Re: boost::operators -> boost::iterator_ops ?

From: jsiek_at_[hidden]
Date: 1999-11-29 23:13:32

Beman Dawes writes:
 > At 07:31 PM 11/28/99 -0500, Jeremy Siek wrote:
 > Questions:
 > 
 > *  Should the iterator_ops.hpp code be part of operators.hpp, or in a
 > separate iterator_ops.hpp header?

I think it would be simpler to have just the one file, especially
since the amount of code is so small.

 > *  Combining both into a single file means two copyrights.  If Dave
 > or Jeremy (or anyone else) has a problem with this, please say so.

Ok by me.

 > *  Anyone willing to write some simple documentation?  I am willing
 > to do it if the iterator_ops.hpp stuff gets added to operator.hpp.

Great, I'm also willing to help or review :)

Cheers,

Jeremy