Re: [boost] PLEASE READ: Another round of operators.hpp fixes

From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-07-05 23:28:35

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Rodgers" <mark.rodgers_at_[hidden]>

> Yes, it looks fine to me.  AFAICT the changes you've made since my last
> attempt have been purely to improve the documentation -

That was the bulk of it. Your last stuff covered all of the technical
requirements; I just wanted to add clarity.

> is_boost_operator_template has become is_chained_base and has been moved
> up, and some comments have been changed/added.  Is there anything else
> I should be looking at?

Nope

> Anyway, both operators_test and iterators_test compile and work fine
> for me with
>
>   Borland C++ 5.4 (BCB 4)
>   Borland C++ 5.5
>   g++ 2.95.2
>   MSVC 6 SP3
>
> all with their standard libraries (i.e., no STLport, etc).

Wonderful!

Still looking for someone else who's not so close to it to scan through this
code...

-Dave