RE: [boost] iterator_adaptors.hpp/transform_iterator

From: John E. Potter (jpotter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-27 14:06:37

On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Gary Powell wrote:

> As I see it, for VTL, I don't want just value semantics for
> transform_iterators. Depending on the function I may want a reference
> returned. (The issue isn't just increment and decrement.)

Have you looked at projection_iterator?  It is the reference equivalent
of transform_iterator.  Also supports any category.

John