Re: [boost] improved config setup

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-24 12:56:35

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Maddock" <John_Maddock_at_[hidden]>

> >P.P.S.: IIRC, The problem with BOOST_NO_OPERATORS_IN_NAMESPACE only shows
> up
> >when there are other definitions of a function with the same name
visible.
> I
> >don't remember whether it's a compile-time or a link-time issue, but GCC
> >gets confused over which function it is looking for.
>
> What does "of the same name" mean in terms of an operator - another
> operator of the same um, name, but with different argument types?

Exactly.