Re: [boost] function and BOOST_NO_DEPENDENT_BASE_LOOKUP

From: John Maddock (John_Maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-28 06:44:17

I'm impressed, and I am sorry I asked :-)

>What's the resolution? BOOST_NO_DEPENDENT_BASE_LOOKUP is the wrong name
for 
>the macro for sure - it isn't a compiler deficiency at all. Most likely
the 
>macro should be removed and I'll work on a way to deal with the copy 
>efficiency problems.

OK, I won't try and build a test case for that one then (breaths sigh of
relief!).

- John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/