Re: [boost] Re: Boost.Build on IBM, SGI & HP

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-12 12:45:01

From: <williamkempf_at_[hidden]>
> Well, from a Windows perspective, the Jam solution is lightyears
> better then make + autoconf, since we don't have autoconf and though
> we do have variants of make they are all a pain to maintain in
> comparison to Jam.

Let's not forget the big picture. From a Windows perspective nothing beats
prebuilt libraries. :-)

--
Peter Dimov
Multi Media Ltd.