|
|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-14 12:35:36
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
> Or rather, shall we change the containers so that they place less
> requirements on the contained objects? Perhaps.
>
> http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#276 ;-)
I like the idea. However, those who insisted on the current status quo will
be unhappy if they can't sort() elements without having their referents
deleted.
-Dave
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk