Re: [boost] new version of smart pointer class templates

From: Greg Colvin (gcolvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-25 16:27:21

> I don't think this will work.  There is no implicit conversion between 0
> shared_ptr<FILE>, which is a good thing.

Sorry.  I forgot to add my usual "Warning: uncompiled, untested code
fresh off the top of my overworked head."

Peter's version that throws an exception is better anyway.  I just
wanted to highlite the use of this new feature.