|
Boost : |
From: Matthias Troyer (troyer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-28 10:41:12
On Monday, January 28, 2002, at 04:03 PM, quendezus wrote:
>
> All these persistence libraries are intrusive (you have to use a base
> class). Some of them don't use serialization. They all heavily rely
> on runtime polymorphism. I think a boost persistence library should
> be non intrusive and should use template programming.
>
> Sylvain
I agree completely. In some cases runtime polymorphism seems to be needed
for the reader/writer objects but not for the classes to be
(de)serialized
Matthias
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk