Re: [boost] Boost.Threads: volatile methods of mutex class

From: Darin Adler (darin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-29 12:26:30

On 1/29/02 9:24 AM, "davlet_panech" <davlet_panech_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I propose that we make sure that places like scoped_lock constructor
> take a reference to a volatile mutex, instead of a plain one.

Can we instead mark the relevant members of the mutex class volatile on
those platforms?

    -- Darin