|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-03 08:08:50
David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Sankel <camio_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Browsing the Boost.Python documentation, I've begun
>> to wonder why they python library should be a part of
>> boost.
>>
> I'm not going to try, but I will say that the question of whether
> Boost.Python is appropriate for standardization came up several times
> during the Boost.Python review. For some reason I seem to be unable to
> locate the review commentary in our mail archives.
Ah, here it is (most of it, anyway):
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/search?query=py_cpp+review&type=Archive_boost_list
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/1143107
-- David Abrahams dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk