Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-04 11:00:33

Next message: Jaakko Jarvi: "Re: [boost] small enable_if documentation or header bug"
Previous message: Carl Daniel: "[boost] Re: compiler confirmance table"
In reply to: David B. Held: "[boost] Re: [multi_index][repost] ANN: Post-review version available"

"David B. Held" ha escrito:

> > [...]
>
> I would just like to second the vote that "far pointer" is confusing
> in the way you have used it (it most definitely brings to mind a
> segmented memory architecture, and not the chaining that you
> really mean). The rest of the points listed in the notes look fine
> to me.
>

Well, it's three against one :) OK, I'll change that.

Best,

Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

Next message: Jaakko Jarvi: "Re: [boost] small enable_if documentation or header bug"
Previous message: Carl Daniel: "[boost] Re: compiler confirmance table"
In reply to: David B. Held: "[boost] Re: [multi_index][repost] ANN: Post-review version available"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk