Re: [boost] [thread] Reducing the number of open tickets.

Subject: Re: [boost] [thread] Reducing the number of open tickets.
From: Anthony Williams (anthony.ajw_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-01-03 12:50:36

On 03/01/12 17:28, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> Le 29/12/11 15:26, Vicente J. Botet Escriba a écrit :
>> Le 17/12/11 15:35, Vicente J. Botet Escriba a écrit :
>>> Le 05/12/11 12:02, Anthony Williams a écrit :
>>>> On 04/12/11 23:56, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
>>>>> Le 03/12/11 18:23, Vicente J. Botet Escriba a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Anthony, please take a look at them and merge whatever you consider is
>>>>> good after the testers have the time to take them in account (not
>>>>> before
>>>>> the 12/12/2011)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for doing this Vicente. I will take a look when the tests
>>>> have cycled, and merge them to release.
>>>>
>>> Any news on that?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Vicente
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
>>> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>>>
>> Anthony, I would like to continue committing other patch for other
>> tickets,
>>
>> #5351 <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5351> interrupt a
>> future get boost::unknown_exception
>> <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5351>
>> #5990 <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5990>
>> shared_future<T>::get() has wrong return type
>> <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5990>
>> #6174 <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6174> packaged_task
>> doesn't correctly handle moving results
>> <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6174>
>> #5516 <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5516> Upgrade lock is
>> not acquired when previous upgrade lock releases if another read lock
>> is present <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/5516>
>>
>> Part of #6195 <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6195> c++11
>> compliance: Provide the standard time related interface using
>> Boost.Chrono <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6195>
>>
>> but I would prefer if you merge before the current state on trunk.
>> The date limit to merge to release for 1.49 is very close. If you have
>> no time to do the merge I could do it, but I really prefer that you do
>> it so that the modifications are inspected.
>>
>> Please, let me know.
>>
> Anthony,
>
> I guess you are very busy, so I will merge to release, so that I will
> continue the work on the trunk.

I'm in the middle of doing the merge. There's a change to a 
WaitForMultipleObjects call that changes a true parameter to false for 
Windows CE that I need to check.

Anthony
-- 
Author of C++ Concurrency in Action     http://www.stdthread.co.uk/book/
just::thread C++0x thread library             http://www.stdthread.co.uk
Just Software Solutions Ltd       http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk
15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL, UK. Company No. 5478976