Re: [boost] [functional] adding overload

Subject: Re: [boost] [functional] adding overload
From: Mostafa (mostafa_working_away_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-01-15 19:30:43

On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:53:24 -0800, Lorenzo Caminiti  
<lorcaminiti_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> During Boost.Local review, it was proposed to move the overload
> template out of Local and in Boost.Functional. What would the best
> name for it?
>
> 1) boost::overload_function (my preference)
> 2) boost::overloaded_function
> 3) boost::function_overload
> 4) boost::functional::overload (Boost.Functional seems to use boost::
> directly and not boost::functional-- to mimic C++11 <functional>).

What about boost::multi_function?