November 2014 - Boost-users

[Optional] Possible bug with VS2008
by dariomt＠gmail.com 05 Nov '14

05 Nov '14

Hi, The following minimal test case does not compile with VS2008 (using Boost 1.55) #include <boost/optional.hpp> struct A { int T; }; int main() { boost::optional<A> a; } The error is, edited for clarity: boost\optional\optional.hpp(479) : error C2523: 'A::~T' : destructor tag mismatch boost\optional\optional.hpp(479) : while compiling class template member function 'void boost::optional_detail::optional_base<T>::destroy_impl(boost::optional_detail::optional_base<T>::is_not_reference_tag)' with [ T=A ] boost\optional\optional.hpp(500) : see reference to class template instantiation 'boost::optional_detail::optional_base<T>' being compiled with [ T=A ] main.cpp(8) : see reference to class template instantiation 'boost::optional<T>' being compiled with [ T=A ] After much head-scratching, I found out the culprit: the name of the integer member!! The compiler confuses the name of member 'T' with the name of the template parameter 'T' when trying to invoke its destructor... The offending code is void destroy_impl ( is_not_reference_tag ) { get_ptr_impl()->T::~T() ; m_initialized = false ; } Given that I cannot change struct A, is there a way to fix this? Is this a compiler bug or a Boost.Optional bug? Thanks in advance!

1 0

Spirit with UI Tools
by Philipp Kraus 05 Nov '14

05 Nov '14

Hello, I would like to create a small parser with Boost.Spirit. I have run the short examples and everything works well, so I would like to create my own LL grammar. In my case I need also for documentation a EBNF or something else and in the best case I can would like to create the EBNF first and transform this into the Spirit LL grammar code. Did you know any tools to do this? My first idea is to use AntLR to create the grammar but imho it creates a LR grammar. Can you recommend a tool to define the grammar structure and generate the Spirit code? Thanks a lot Phil

3 6

Boost.Variant on Boost 1.57
by gast128 04 Nov '14

04 Nov '14

hello all, I get a compilation error with Boost.Operators and boost.Variant on vs2010: struct KFoo : boost::totally_ordered<KFoo> { }; bool operator<(const KFoo&, const KFoo&); bool operator==(const KFoo&, const KFoo&); void Foo() { boost::variant<KFoo> var; var.swap(var); } 1>C:\work sdk\boost_1_57_0\boost/variant/detail/move.hpp(60): error C2668: 'boost::swap' : ambiguous call to overloaded function 1> C:\work sdk\boost_1_57_0\boost/core/swap.hpp(54): could be 'void boost::swap<T,T>(T1 &,T2 &)' [found using argument-dependent lookup] 1> with 1> [ 1> T=T0, 1> T1=T0, 1> T2=T0 1> ] 1> C:\work sdk\boost_1_57_0\boost/variant/detail/move.hpp(44): or 'void boost::detail::variant::move_swap_fallback::swap<T,T>(T1 &,T2 &)' anyone?

1 0

bjam building with error
by NtVisigoth 04 Nov '14

04 Nov '14

Hello, I cannot compile bjam.exe and I see error. I have googled and I see my trouble here: Name: "Build.bat does not autodetect msvc on 64-bit Windows when building bjam" URL: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1091 To reproduce: 0. cd <boos libraries directory> 1. Start cmd.exe. 2. Then start bootstrap.bat I see: d:\projects\cpp-workspace\boost-libraries>bootstrap.bat Building Boost.Build engine \\Vim\\vim74\\";c:\portable-programs\adt-bundle-windows-x86_64\sdk\\platform-tools;c:\portable-progr ams\adt-bundle-windows-x86_64\sdk\\tools" was unexpected at this time. d:\projects\cpp-workspace\boost-libraries\tools\build\src\engine> What can I do to compile bjam ?

1 0

problem with #include <boost/thread.hpp>
by Grison PG Pierre (External DEXIA-US) 04 Nov '14

04 Nov '14

Hello, I encounter a problem with the Thread library. The library works fine when I use it in a .exe project. It means it has been correctly built. Then I try to use the same library in an DLL project (so as to build a XLL object thanks to the XLW library). But as soon as I add the line #include <boost/thread.hpp> to my project, even if it compile without any problem, I get the following message when I debug my project through Excel: The file you are trying to open, "mylibrary.xll" is in a different format than specified by the file extension, Verify that the file is not corrupted [...]. Do you want to open the file now? And I can no more use my C++ functions in Excel. Do you have already encounter this problem? I use VS2010. I have tried both Multi-threaded Debug DLL (/MDd) and Multi-threaded DLL (/MD) options. My solution includes two other static libraries and also with the classic RunInterfaceGenerator XLW-project (the one which is executed when debugging). Regards, Pierre

2 1

iterator_facade Boost 1.57
by gast128 04 Nov '14

04 Nov '14

Dear all, Just trying out 1.57, since we are already 5 releases behind due to all kinds of compilation errors with Boost and our software. Below simplified code doesn't compile on vs2010: template <typename DerivedType> struct IteratorFacade : public boost::iterator_facade<DerivedType, int, std::random_access_iterator_tag> { typedef boost::iterator_facade<DerivedType, int, std::random_access_iterator_tag> base; IteratorFacade (); virtual ~IteratorFacade (); friend class boost::iterator_core_access; reference dereference () const; }; struct MyIteratorFacade : IteratorFacade<MyIteratorFacade> { }; What do I wrong?

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] Boost 1.57.0 has been released
by Tom Kent 04 Nov '14

04 Nov '14

> > Release 1.57.0 of the Boost C++ Libraries is now available. > These open-source libraries work well with the C++ Standard Library, and > are usable across a broad spectrum of applications. > The Boost license encourages both commercial and non-commercial use. > This release contains no new libraries and numerous enhancements and bug > fixes for existing libraries. > For details, including download links, see > http://www.boost.org/users/news/version_1.57.0 > You can also download directly from SourceForge: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.57.0/ > To install this release on your system, see > http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/release/more/getting_started/index.html > Thanks, > --The Boost release team > Vladimir Prus > Rene Rivera > Marshall Clow > Eric Niebler > Daniel James > Beman Dawes The corresponding windows binaries for msvc-8.0 (SP1), msvc-9.0 (SP1), msvc-10.0 (SP1), msvc-11.0 (Update 4) and msvc-12.0 (Update 3) in 32 & 64 bit versions are now also available from sourceforge. https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost-binaries/1.57.0/ Tom Kent

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] [Boost-announce] Boost 1.57.0 has been released
by Marshall Clow 04 Nov '14

04 Nov '14

> Hi Marshall, > > I wonder if the "Beta Issues” section on the release notes page (http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_57_0.html) is correct,… Looks like a copy-paste leftover from the beta version. Several people reported this. Thank you. It has been fixed. — Marshall

1 0

Boost 1.57.0 has been released
by Marshall Clow 03 Nov '14

03 Nov '14

Release 1.57.0 of the Boost C++ Libraries is now available. These open-source libraries work well with the C++ Standard Library, and are usable across a broad spectrum of applications. The Boost license encourages both commercial and non-commercial use. This release contains no new libraries and numerous enhancements and bug fixes for existing libraries. For details, including download links, see http://www.boost.org/users/news/version_1.57.0 You can also download directly from SourceForge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.57.0/ To install this release on your system, see http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/release/more/getting_started/index.html Thanks, --The Boost release team Vladimir Prus Rene Rivera Marshall Clow Eric Niebler Daniel James Beman Dawes

4 3

[Test] How to log output to both stdout in HRF and to a file in XML?
by Martin Ba 03 Nov '14

03 Nov '14

As asked on SO: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26505229/how-to-log-boost-test-output-to… I would like to enable logging of Boost.Test output to *both* the stdout/sterr and to a logfile. However, I would also like to have the stdout logging be in HumanReadableFormat and only the file output be in XML format. Generating a report file seems to be addressed [here][1]. ([official docs][2]) Choosing the format can be done in [various ways][3], but it seems one is stuck with either HRF or XML? ----------- Rationale: When running tests on or [Jenkins][4] server, the [xUnit plugin][5] [requires][6] the **log** XML output (as opposed to the *report* XML output -- `log_level` vs. `report_level`). However, the in-progress log output (in HRF) is highly valuable *while* the tests are running on the server, to detect hanging tests or to a quick manual check of where the tests currently are. So I want an in-progress HRF log for the tests and at the end I need an XML file containing the `<TestLog>...</TestLog>` output of Boost.Test (not the `<TestResult>` output). Do note that we run both unit as well as integration tests via Boost.Test, so some of them are quite long-running. [1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3786639/what-is-the-better-way-to-genera… [2]: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_44_0/libs/test/doc/html/utf/user-guide/test… [3]: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_44_0/libs/test/doc/html/utf/user-guide/runt… [4]: http://jenkins-ci.org/ [5]: https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/xUnit+Plugin [6]: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-13686

2 1