- Boost-users - lists.boost.org

boost::interprocess map: no appropriate default constructor compile error
by Chris Miclea 23 Mar '10

23 Mar '10

Hello, I have a problem when compiling code using boost::interprocess library code. I've run into a compile error while trying to create a map in a boost shared memory object. I am using the VisualStudio2005 C++ compiler, and boost 1.38. The symptom is: C:\svn\ThirdPartySDK\boost_1_38_0\boost/interprocess/containers/map.hpp( 140) : error C2512: 'boost::interprocess::allocator<T,SegmentManager>::allocator' : no appropriate default constructor available with [ T=std::pair<sage::lib::clientDataServer::MapKey<10>,sage::lib::clientDat aServer::Data>, SegmentManager=boost::interprocess::segment_manager<char,boost::interpro cess::rbtree_best_fit<boost::interprocess::mutex_family>,boost::interpro cess::iset_index> ] Quick description - code is attached below: templated class ReadOnlyCatalog, taking an int template LENGTH and a template parm class T (T is the mapped data, or "second" in the pair). the map index is a templated class called MapKey, taking an int LENGTH. templated class MapKeyLess to provide the less() operator for the map index. Can anyone tell why am I getting the compiler error? Your help is greatly appreciated. template <int LENGTH, class T> class ReadOnlyCatalog { public: typedef std::pair<MapKey<LENGTH>, T> Value_t; typedef boost::interprocess::allocator<Value_t, boost::interprocess::managed_shared_memory::segment_manager> Allocator_t; typedef boost::interprocess::map<MapKey<LENGTH>, T, MapKeyLess<LENGTH>, Allocator_t> Map_t; ReadOnlyCatalog() { ... } ReadOnlyCatalog( const RoShMemType_e in_type, const std::string& in_segName, const std::string& in_objName ) { ... } }; const int OrderTypeKeyLength = 10; class Data { public: Data() { ... }; } template <int LENGTH> class MapKey { public: MapKey() { .. } MapKey( const std::string& in_key ) { ... } public: char m_key[LENGTH + 1]; }; template <int LENGTH> class MapKeyLess { public: bool operator()( const MapKey<LENGTH>& a, const MapKey<LENGTH>& b ) const { return strncmp( a.m_key, b.m_key, LENGTH ) < 0; } }; // instantiate ReadOnlyCatalog template; class OrderTypeCatalog : public ReadOnlyCatalog<OrderTypeKeyLength, Data> { public: OrderTypeCatalog() {} OrderTypeCatalog( const RoShMemType_e in_type, const std::string& in_segName, const std::string& in_objName ) : ReadOnlyCatalog( in_type, in_segName, in_objName ) {}; }; // a use of OrderTypeCatalog class X { public: X() { ptr = new OrderTypeCatalog( in_type, "aaa", "bbb" ); } private: OrderTypeCatalog* ptr; }; Included headers: #include <boost/interprocess/shared_memory_object.hpp> #include <boost/interprocess/mapped_region.hpp> #include <boost/interprocess/managed_shared_memory.hpp> #include <boost/interprocess/containers/vector.hpp> #include <boost/interprocess/containers/map.hpp> #include <boost/interprocess/allocators/allocator.hpp> Full compiler error message: C:\svn\ThirdPartySDK\boost_1_38_0\boost/interprocess/containers/map.hpp( 140) : error C2512: 'boost::interprocess::allocator<T,SegmentManager>::allocator' : no appropriate default constructor available with [ T=std::pair<sage::lib::clientDataServer::MapKey<10>,sage::lib::clientDat aServer::Data>, SegmentManager=boost::interprocess::segment_manager<char,boost::interpro cess::rbtree_best_fit<boost::interprocess::mutex_family>,boost::interpro cess::iset_index> ] C:\svn\Projects\trunk\Lib/ClientDataServer/ReadOnlySegments.h(166) : while compiling class template member function 'sage::lib::clientDataServer::ReadOnlyCatalog<LENGTH,T>::ReadOnlyCatalog (void)' with [ LENGTH=10, T=sage::lib::clientDataServer::Data ] C:\svn\Projects\trunk\Lib/CLientDataServer/ReadOnlyShMem.h(25) : see reference to class template instantiation 'sage::lib::clientDataServer::ReadOnlyCatalog<LENGTH,T>' being compiled with [ LENGTH=10, T=sage::lib::clientDataServer::Data ] Regards, Chris Miclea

2 1

Compiling boost 1.42.0 with Sun Studio for Solaris x64 utterly fails
by Iskandar Prins 23 Mar '10

23 Mar '10

Hi, Im trying to compile boost with sun studio 12 update 1 for solaris x64. After a little browsing I needed to use the following command: bjam toolset=sun stdlib=sun-stlport address-model=64 stage Source: http://blogs.sun.com/sga/entry/boost_and_sun_studio_12 Ouput CC -V: CC: Sun C++ 5.10 SunOS_i386 2009/06/03 However when I do this I get the following errors: ./bjam toolset=sun stdlib=sun-stlport address-model=64 stage warning: Building Boost.Regex with the optional Unicode/ICU support disabled. note: Please refer to the Boost.Regex documentation for more information note: this is a strictly optional feature. warning: Graph library does not contain MPI-based parallel components. note: to enable them, add "using mpi ;" to your user-config.jam warning: skipping optional Message Passing Interface (MPI) library. note: to enable MPI support, add "using mpi ;" to user-config.jam. note: to suppress this message, pass "--without-mpi" to bjam. note: otherwise, you can safely ignore this message. ...patience... ...patience... ...patience... ...found 6676 targets... ...updating 466 targets... sun.compile.c++ bin.v2/libs/python/build/sun/release/address-model-64/stdlib-sun-stlport/threading-multi/numeric.o "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 47: Error: BOOST_PP_ENUM_1 is not defined. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 48: Error: Badly formed expression. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 47: Error: BOOST_PP_ENUM_1 is not defined. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 48: Error: Badly formed expression. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 47: Error: BOOST_PP_ENUM_1 is not defined. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 48: Error: Badly formed expression. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 47: Error: BOOST_PP_ENUM_1 is not defined. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 48: Error: Badly formed expression. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 47: Error: BOOST_PP_ENUM_1 is not defined. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 48: Error: Badly formed expression. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 47: Error: BOOST_PP_ENUM_1 is not defined. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 48: Error: Badly formed expression. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 47: Error: BOOST_PP_ENUM_1 is not defined. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 48: Error: Badly formed expression. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 47: Error: BOOST_PP_ENUM_1 is not defined. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 48: Error: Badly formed expression. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 47: Error: BOOST_PP_ENUM_1 is not defined. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 48: Error: Badly formed expression. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 47: Error: BOOST_PP_ENUM_1 is not defined. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 48: Error: Badly formed expression. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 47: Error: BOOST_PP_ENUM_1 is not defined. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 48: Error: Badly formed expression. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 47: Error: BOOST_PP_ENUM_1 is not defined. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 48: Error: Badly formed expression. "./boost/python/detail/type_list_impl.hpp", line 47: Error: BOOST_PP_ENUM_1 is not defined. Compilation aborted, too many Error messages. "CC" -library=stlport4 -xO4 -mt -erroff=%none -m64 -KPIC -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -DBOOST_PYTHON_SOURCE -DNDEBUG -I"." -I"/usr/include/python2.4" -c -o "bin.v2/libs/python/build/sun/release/address-model-64/stdlib-sun-stlport/threading-multi/numeric.o" "libs/python/src/numeric.cpp" I haven't pasted the rest of the failures, since I think this is due because of this first failure. If need be, let me know, so I can email that as well. Regards, Iskandar

1 0

[wave] Some basic questions...
by Paul Johnson 23 Mar '10

23 Mar '10

I've just started using wave, but it occurs to me that there are some basic things I don't understand about it, and which aren't (I think) covered in the online docs. Does anyone know: 1 - presumably wave uses UTF-8? Will it accept arbitrary UTF-8 files? What if the source starts with a 3-byte UTF-8 BOM? 2 - how closely does the source have to conform to C/C++ code? I can understand that the source has to follow basic lexing conventions (use of apostrophes, and so on), but wave actually seems to carry out full C++ lexing. Why is this necessary - could it just process whitespace-delimited tokens (outside comments)? The reason I'm asking is that I'm pre-processing arbitrary non-C code. This seems to be Ok if I disable whitespace insertion for disambiguation, but I'd just like to be sure that I'm not missing something. Thanks - Paul

1 0

undefined reference to `boost::program_options
by G.NAGENDAR 23 Mar '10

23 Mar '10

Hi, When i run my C++ program which is using boost library, i am getting these errors main.o: In function `boost::program_options:: variables_map::operator[](std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) const': /usr/local/include/boost-1_35/boost/program_options/variables_map.hpp:161: undefined reference to `boost::program_options::abstract_variables_map::operator[](std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) const' /usr/local/include/boost-1_35/boost/program_options/variables_map.hpp:161: undefined reference to `boost::program_options::abstract_variables_map::operator[](std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) const' /usr/local/include/boost-1_35/boost/program_options/variables_map.hpp:161: undefined reference to `boost::program_options::abstract_variables_map::operator[](std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) const' /usr/local/include/boost-1_35/boost/program_options/variables_map.hpp:161: undefined reference to `boost::program_options::abstract_variables_map::operator[](std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) const When i try to link the program library ( -lboost_program_options-mt ) it is giving errors /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lboost_program_options-mt collect2: ld returned 1 exit status I have checked these using ls /usr/lib|grep boost command Output is libboost_date_time-mt.so.1.34. 1 libboost_date_time-mt.so.3 libboost_date_time.so.1.34.1 libboost_date_time.so.3 libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.34.1 libboost_filesystem-mt.so.3 libboost_filesystem.so.1.34.1 libboost_filesystem.so.3 libboost_graph-mt.so.1.34.1 libboost_graph-mt.so.3 libboost_graph.so.1.34.1 libboost_graph.so.3 libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.34.1 libboost_iostreams-mt.so.3 libboost_iostreams.so.1.34.1 libboost_iostreams.so.3 libboost_prg_exec_monitor-mt.so.1.34.1 libboost_prg_exec_monitor-mt.so.3 libboost_prg_exec_monitor.so.1.34.1 libboost_prg_exec_monitor.so.3 libboost_program_options-mt.so.1.34.1 libboost_program_options-mt.so.3 libboost_program_options.so.1.34.1 libboost_program_options.so.3 libboost_python-mt.so.1.34.1 libboost_python-mt.so.3 libboost_python.so.1.34.1 libboost_python.so.3 libboost_regex-mt.so.1.34.1 libboost_regex-mt.so.3 libboost_regex.so.1.34.1 libboost_regex.so.3 libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.34.1 libboost_serialization-mt.so.3 libboost_serialization.so.1.34.1 libboost_serialization.so.3 libboost_signals-mt.so.1.34.1 libboost_signals-mt.so.3 libboost_signals.so.1.34.1 libboost_signals.so.3 libboost_thread-mt.so.1.34.1 libboost_thread-mt.so.3 libboost_unit_test_framework-mt.so.1.34.1 libboost_unit_test_framework-mt.so.3 libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.34.1 libboost_unit_test_framework.so.3 libboost_wave-mt.so.1.34.1 libboost_wave-mt.so.3 libboost_wave.so.1.34.1 libboost_wave.so.3 libboost_wserialization-mt.so.1.34.1 libboost_wserialization-mt.so.3 libboost_wserialization.so.1.34.1 libboost_wserialization.so.3 My LD_LIBRARY_PATH contains /usr/local/lib /usr/lib /usr/local/include/boost-1_35/boost Please help to solve this problem. Please... -- Thanks & Regards Nagendar

2 1

[concept]
by er 22 Mar '10

22 Mar '10

Hello, With gcc version 4.4.1 (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu9). This BOOST_CONCEPT_ASSERT((boost::SinglePassRangeConcept<boost::array<int,8u>>)); is greeted with the warning below, which is annoying. It appears that the reference T& template<typename T> struct SinglePassRangeConcept { private: T& m_range; }; is causing it, but can be eliminated by replacing T& by static T& m_range. Perhaps there is a good reason for T& rather than static T& so I stopped short of putting a request in trac. Please advise. Thanks. ../../Reposetories/boost/trunk/boost/concept/detail/has_constraints.hpp|42|instantiated from ‘const bool boost::concepts::not_satisfied<boost::SinglePassRangeConcept<boost::array<int, 8u> > >::value’| ../../Reposetories/boost/trunk/boost/concept/detail/has_constraints.hpp|45|instantiated from ‘boost::concepts::not_satisfied<boost::SinglePassRangeConcept<boost::array<int, 8u> > >’| ../../Reposetories/boost/trunk/boost/mpl/if.hpp|67|instantiated from ‘boost::mpl::if_<boost::concepts::not_satisfied<boost::SinglePassRangeConcept<boost::array<int, 8u> > >, boost::concepts::constraint<boost::SinglePassRangeConcept<boost::array<int, 8u> > >, boost::concepts::requirement<boost::concepts::failed************ boost::SinglePassRangeConcept<boost::array<int, 8u> >::************> >’| ../../Reposetories/boost/trunk/boost/concept/detail/general.hpp|20|instantiated from ‘boost::concepts::requirement_<void (*)(boost::SinglePassRangeConcept<boost::array<int, 8u> >)>’| /home/me/Reposetories/boost/sanbox/statistics/detail/assign/libs/assign/example/chain.cpp|42|instantiated from here| ../../Reposetories/boost/trunk/boost/range/concepts.hpp|209|warning: non-static reference ‘boost::array<int, 8u>& boost::SinglePassRangeConcept<boost::array<int, 8u> >::m_range’ in class without a constructor| /home/me/Reposetories/boost/sanbox/statistics/detail/assign/libs/assign/example/chain.cpp||In function ‘void example_ch

2 2

[proto] need explanation in implementing distributive law
by Kim Kuen Tang 22 Mar '10

22 Mar '10

Hi all, i would like to implement a grammar that transform a*(b+c) to a*b+a*c where a,b and c are terminals. The implementation of this grammar is straightforward and should compile. However i got errors that i dont understand. Below is the code that reproduces the errors. Thanks for any help, Kim # include <boost/cstdlib.hpp> # include <boost/proto/proto.hpp> # include <boost/fusion/container/list/cons.hpp> # include <boost/proto/tags.hpp> # include <boost/proto/make_expr.hpp> # define PRECISION_MAKE_tag(name) \ struct name \ { \ friend std::ostream& operator<< (std::ostream& s, name const&) \ { \ return s<< #name; \ } \ }; # define PRECISION_MAKE_terminal(name) \ proto::terminal< tag::name >::type const name = {{}} namespace proto = boost::proto; namespace tag{ PRECISION_MAKE_tag(a); PRECISION_MAKE_tag(b); PRECISION_MAKE_tag(c); } namespace mpl = boost::mpl; namespace fusion = boost::fusion; using proto::_; struct DistributiveLaw : proto::or_< proto::when< proto::multiplies< proto::terminal< _ > , proto::plus< _, _ > > , proto::plus< proto::multiplies<proto::_left,proto::_left(proto::_right)> , proto::multiplies<proto::_left,proto::_right(proto::_right)> //, proto::_right(proto::_right) >( proto::multiplies<proto::_left,proto::_left(proto::_right)> (proto::_left,proto::_left(proto::_right)) , proto::multiplies<proto::_left,proto::_right(proto::_right)> (proto::_left,proto::_right(proto::_right)) //, proto::_right(proto::_right) ) > , proto::otherwise<proto::nary_expr<_, proto::vararg<DistributiveLaw> > > > {}; PRECISION_MAKE_terminal(a); PRECISION_MAKE_terminal(b); PRECISION_MAKE_terminal(c); # undef PRECISION_MAKE_tag # undef PRECISION_MAKE_terminal int main() { proto::display_expr(a*(b+c)); proto::display_expr(DistributiveLaw()( a*(b+c) )); return boost::exit_success; }

3 4

boost::bind and max #args
by Andrej van der Zee 22 Mar '10

22 Mar '10

Hi, I need to call boost::bind with 10 arguments. I believe that the maximum is nine. Is there a way to increase this? Thank you, Andrej

4 4

Re: [Boost-users] [program-options] static linked example segfaults for exception
by Neetu Garg 22 Mar '10

22 Mar '10

Hi, Can I please get some input on this issue. Thanks for your help Regards, NG ----- Original Message ---- From: Neetu Garg <garg_neetu(a)yahoo.com> To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org Sent: Fri, March 19, 2010 11:08:43 AM Subject: Re: program option library segfaults for exception I did little more digging into the issue If I compile and link following sample on Linux dynamically using following command g++ -c -I. -I/usr/local/include/boost-1_38 -I/usr/include testprogramoptions.cpp -o testprogramoptions.o g++ testprogramoptions.o -static-libgcc -L/u/neetug/Projects/performance/perfstat_cluster/lib -lboost_program_options-gcc41-mt -lpthread -o testprogramoptions [root@perf-tools-7 src]# ./testprogramoptions --o ERROR unknown option o ERROR Error while parsing CLI options Exiting Here "--o" is unknown option ======================================================================= If I compile and link following sample on Linux statically using following command g++ -c -I. -I/usr/local/include/boost-1_38 -I/usr/include testprogramoptions.cpp -o testprogramoptions.o g++ testprogramoptions.o -static-libgcc -Wl,-Bstatic -L/u/neetug/Projects/performance/perfstat_cluster/lib -lboost_program_options-gcc41-mt -lpthread -o testprogramoptions [root@perf-tools-7 src]# ./testprogramoptions --o Aborted Here "--o" is unknown option ======================================================================== I am not sure why the behavior is different with different linking option why I am not getting exception for static linking. Really appreciate any help in this issue. Here in the test program #include <iostream> #include <boost/program_options.hpp> namespace boostOptions = boost::program_options; using namespace std; int main(int argCount, char* argList[]) { try { boostOptions::options_description commonOpt("Options (common)"); commonOpt.add_options() ("help,h", "Produce help message.") ("version,v", "Prints perfstat version, and supported ONTAP versions.") ; boostOptions::options_description runModeOpt("Options ('run' mode)"); runModeOpt.add_options() ("clusterinfo", boostOptions::value<string>(), "cluster IP.") ("sample-interval", boostOptions::value<int>(), "Specifies statit/sysstat frequency") ; boostOptions::positional_options_description posOption; posOption.add("clusterinfo", -1); boostOptions::options_description allOptDesc("Allowed options :"); allOptDesc.add(commonOpt).add(runModeOpt); boostOptions::variables_map varMap; boostOptions::store(boostOptions::command_line_parser(argCount, argList). options(allOptDesc).positional(posOption).run(), varMap); boostOptions::notify(varMap); } catch(std::exception &e) { cout << "ERROR " << e.what() << "\n"; cout << "ERROR " << "Error while parsing CLI options Exiting" << "\n"; exit(0); } catch(...) { cout << "ERROR 1 " << "\n"; cout << "ERROR 1 " << "Error while parsing CLI options Exiting" << "\n"; exit(0); } } Regards, NG ----- Original Message ---- From: Neetu Garg <garg_neetu(a)yahoo.com> To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org Sent: Wed, March 17, 2010 1:17:07 PM Subject: program option library segfaults for exception Sorry for the duplicate post, I think my message posted under different conversation. Hi, I have application that is using boost program option library. If I provide unknown option via CLI it should throw exception. The library is statically linked on windows and Linux environment. It works fine on windows platform I do get exception for unknown CLI option. On Linux platform I get "segfault" in place of exception for unknown CLI option. It is s a multi-threaded application and it also uses boost thread library. Application does throw exception on Linux also if I link dynamically. I am using following flags to link the library statically: LDFLAGS= -fexceptions -static-libgcc -Wl,-static -L/usr/lib -lboost_program_options-gcc41-mt -lboost_filesystem-gcc41-mt -lboost_thread-gcc41-mt -lboost_system-gcc41-mt -lnet7ssh -lbotan -ltar -lz -lrt -lpthread I am using following version of gcc: # g++ --version g++ (GCC) 4.1.1 Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Here is the core dump for the segfault: (gdb) backtrace #0 __gnu_internal::get_global () at /usr/software/src/gcc-4.1.1/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_globals.cc:58 #1 0x082c0f67 in __cxa_get_globals () at /usr/software/src/gcc-4.1.1/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_globals.cc:71 #2 0x082c0b3f in __cxa_allocate_exception (thrown_size=32) at /usr/software/src/gcc-4.1.1/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_alloc.cc:154 #3 0x080a71f8 in boost::program_options::detail::cmdline::finish_option () #4 0x080a77eb in boost::program_options::detail::cmdline::run () #5 0x0806f3aa in boost::program_options::basic_command_line_parser<char>::run () #6 0x080660e9 in CLIHandler::collectCLIOptions () #7 0x0808a0d1 in perfstat::runPerfstat () #8 0x0808af3d in main () Current language: auto; currently c++ Appreciate your help Regards, NG

3 2

Compiling for Solaris X64
by Iskandar Prins 22 Mar '10

22 Mar '10

Hi All, I need some help with compiling boost for solaris x64. When I try to compile the bjam, I get a x86 version of bjam and boost, any idea what setting/flag I need to use on bjam? Regards, Iskandar Prins iprins(a)alphabay.nl

2 4

[serialization] Seek in a binary archive
by Damien R 22 Mar '10

22 Mar '10

Hi, I save fixed size objects in a binary archive and when I load the binary archive, I try to seek at a specific position. To do that I call istream.seekg() but the problem is that boost::serialization get the rdbuf of the input stream, so the seek does not work. I would like to know whether I have to create a class like basic_binary_iprimitive or whether there is a better alternative. Thanks,

1 0