- Boost-users - lists.boost.org

[karma] Losing attribute?
by Sebastian Redl 25 Feb '10

25 Feb '10

Hi, I've got a Karma generator that should emit a vector of records, writing out the index of every entry at the start. My code looks like this (note that GEOPOINT is a fusion-adapted struct of two doubles): typedef std::vector<GEOPOINT> Contour; typedef std::vector<Contour> Poly; rule<Iterator, GEOPOINT()> point; rule<Iterator, Contour(int)> contour; rule<Iterator, locals<int>, Poly()> polygon; rule<Iterator, Poly()> start; point = L';' << double_ << L';' << double_; contour = L";SUBPOLYGON " << lit(_r1 - 1) << L" POINTS " << lit(phoenix::size(_val)) << L" MASK XOR" << *point; polygon = L"POLYGON COUNT " << lit(phoenix::size(_val)) << *(contour(_a)[++_a]); start = polygon; This doesn't work. If I take away the modification of _a, it works, except that of course the index is 0 in every iteration. But the moment I modify _a in any way (including assigning to it anywhere in the polygon rule), suddenly contour seems to get an incorrect attribute: it never fails, but never emits points either, i.e. I get an endless string of ";SUBPOLYGON 1 POINTS 0 MASK XOR;SUBPOLYGON 2 POINTS 0 MASK XOR;SUBPOLYGON 3 POINTS 0 MASK XOR...". Any idea why that is? Sebastian

2 3

[program_options] Parsing Config File
by Christian Meesters 25 Feb '10

25 Feb '10

Hi, I'd like to use/abuse boost::program_options to parse a configuration file like this: [project1] parameter=x ... [project2] parameter=y ... [project3] parameter=z ... and so on. Point is that I cannot now how many 'project' entries there will be in advance. Is there a way to parse this and retrieve a list of project keys from boost::program_options::variables_map? Or (the 'abuse' above already suggested that I'm not certain whether this library is the most suited one) is there a better approach? Christian

1 0

[MPL] Filtering a sequence to leave only most-derived types
by Sebastian Redl 25 Feb '10

25 Feb '10

Hi, I've got an MPL sequence containing a (rather small) number of classes. I want to filter this sequence so that all classes that are a base of another class in the sequence are filtered out. I thought I'd do something like this (in pseudo-code): is_strict_base_of(Base, Derived) = !is_same(Base, Derived) && is_base_of(Base, Derived) Result = remove_if( Interfaces, find_if( Interfaces, is_strict_base_of(outer_value, inner_value) ) != end(Interfaces) ) where outer_value is the iteration value of the remove_if loop, and inner_value is the iteration value of the count_if loop. Yes, this is N², but since the length of the initial sequence is very unlikely to exceed 8, I can live with that. In MPL syntax: template <typename Base, typename Derived> struct is_strict_base_of : mpl::and_< mpl::not_<boost::is_same<Base, Derived> >, boost::is_base_of<Base, Derived> > {}; typedef typename mpl::remove_if< Interfaces, // Remove from Interfaces mpl::not_<mpl::equal< mpl::find_if< Interfaces, // if there is any value in interfaces // that this is a base of is_strict_base_of<???> >, mpl::end<Interfaces> > > >::type Bases; How do I represent outer_value and inner_value in this expression? It seems I can't simply put mpl::_1 and mpl::_2 there, since that gives me a static assertion failure (argument is not available). I think I have to put an apply somewhere in there, but I can't figure out where. Sebastian

2 2

accessing a pair<> element of multi_index container, uniquely ordered
by Andrew Kokkalis 25 Feb '10

25 Feb '10

I have the following problem using a multi index container which is uniquely ordered on a pair <int,int>. Each time i want to find every pair i that contains a specific integer. The other value of the pair is irrelevant. An example: <0,1> <0,2> <0,3> <1,2> <1,3> <2,3> and I want to find all the pairs with the value 0 as the first integer. function find() wants the whole pair and iterator find(const CompatibleKey& x,const CompatibleCompare& comp)const; doesn't help ,too. * **Here is the declaration of my container** typedef pair<int, int> clusterset; struct cluster { clusterset pair; float distance; cluster(clusterset pair, float distance) : pair(pair), distance(distance) {} }; struct cluster_pair{}; struct cluster_distance{}; typedef multi_index_container< cluster, indexed_by< ordered_unique< tag<cluster_pair>, BOOST_MULTI_INDEX_MEMBER(cluster, clusterset, pair)>, ordered_non_unique< tag<cluster_distance>, BOOST_MULTI_INDEX_MEMBER(cluster, float, distance)> > > cluster_index;* Any ideas?

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] [serialization] Polymorphic serialization withpolymorphic archives problem...
by Bogdan 25 Feb '10

25 Feb '10

Robert Ramey <ramey <at> rrsd.com> writes: > > > > ================================================== > > What is worrisome though, isomorphic serialization of > > polymorphic_derived1 as an object followed by polymorphic > > serialization through a pointer to the base class FAILS WITH ACCESS > > VIOLATION: > > > > > > ================================================== > > Isomorphic serialization of a class not related to the hierarchy as > > an object followed by polymorphic serialization through a pointer to > > the base class WORKS AS EXPECTED. > > I'm not sure what the above means. > I hoped this would help narrow the 'access violation' issue: - mixing isomorphic and polymorphic serialization seems to be problematic whenever the object using isomorphic serialization is also a part of the hierarchy for which we use polymorphic serialization. - on the other hand, if the object belongs to a totally independent class we do not have this issue. Is it possible this is also related to the registration of serializers? Bogdan

1 0

how can I use jamfile complie WinMain?
by l.jay Yuan 25 Feb '10

25 Feb '10

how can I use jamfile complie WinMain? my cpp code: #include <windows.h> int WINAPI WinMain(HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE hPrevInstance, LPSTR lpCmdLine, int nCmdShow) { return 0; } my jamfile: exe main : [ glob-tree *.cpp *.c : .svn ] ; install . : main : <install-type>EXE ; compile use msvc7.1, I got error LNK2019(___tmainCRTStartup) can bjam do it? someone help me, please, thanks vey much!!!

3 4

message_peek
by David Kaplan 25 Feb '10

25 Feb '10

How do I perform a peek instead of a read (which removes data from the buffer)? I found socket_base::message_peek, how do I use that together with my socket and asio::read()?

1 1

Re: [Boost-users] [serialization] Polymorphic serialization withpolymorphic archives problem...
by Martin Lederhilger 25 Feb '10

25 Feb '10

Hello Robert, hello Bogdan, I have quite the same problem (Exception multiple_code_instantiation thrown in basic_serializer_map.cpp at line 48) as Bogdan. It can be reproduced by changing the pointer type from polymorphic_base to polymorphic_derived2 in the original test_dll_exported.cpp example, which comes with the library. void save_exported(const char *testfile) { test_ostream os(testfile, TEST_STREAM_FLAGS); test_oarchive oa(os, TEST_ARCHIVE_FLAGS); polymorphic_base *rb1 = new polymorphic_derived1; polymorphic_derived2 *rb2 = new polymorphic_derived2; // export will permit correct serialization // through a pointer to a base class oa << BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(rb1); oa << BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(rb2); delete rb1; delete rb2; } I think the problem is that when oa << BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(rb2); is called, that the system registers an type in oserializer.hpp, which leads to creation of the singletons also in the executeable. I have this problem when serializing a shared_ptr<A> in class B in B.dll to an object of class A in A.dll. I tried to simply comment out this check, but it seems that I get problems with tracking later. I have a class hierarchy like this: C derives from B derives from A. A has a weak_ptr<A> to itself (something like boost::enable_shared_from_this). If I serialize an object of type C via a base pointer of type B the serialization walks like this: C::serialize, B::serialize, A::serialize, and again C::serialize (with a wrong this pointer - and it should not do that). Maybe my second problem depends on the first one. I hope that my report can be of help. Thanks in advance for your answers, Martin Lederhilger

2 3

list all boost tests
by Martin Ankerl 25 Feb '10

25 Feb '10

Hi all, we are using BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE() and BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE() to create lots of tests. Is it possible to list all the tests available in an executable? I have tried to create a special test "help" that calls boost::unit_test::traverse_test_tree(), but this only shows the tests that are selected for this test run. Martin

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] [serialization] Polymorphic serialization withpolymorphic archives problem...
by Bogdan 25 Feb '10

25 Feb '10

Robert Ramey <ramey <at> rrsd.com> writes: > > Martin Lederhilger wrote: > > Hello Robert, hello Bogdan, > > > > I have quite the same problem (Exception multiple_code_instantiation > > thrown in basic_serializer_map.cpp at line 48) as Bogdan. It can be > > reproduced by changing > > the pointer type from polymorphic_base to polymorphic_derived2 in the > > original test_dll_exported.cpp example, which comes with the library. > > I think the problem is that when oa << BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(rb2); > > is called, that the system registers an type in oserializer.hpp, which > > leads to creation of the singletons also in the executeable. > > Ahhhh - a very useful hint. So the rule would be that if a class > is polymorphic is to be serialized through a pointer, it should ONLY > be done through a base class pointer? That is, if ALL polymorphic > base classes are abstract - this problem will never occur? > > I'll have to think about this. > > > I have this problem when serializing a shared_ptr<A> in class B in > > B.dll to an object of class A in A.dll. > > > > I tried to simply comment out this check, but it seems that I get > > problems with tracking later. I have a class hierarchy like this: > > C derives from B derives from A. A has a weak_ptr<A> to itself > > (something like boost::enable_shared_from_this). If I serialize an > > object of type C via a base pointer of type B the serialization walks > > like this: C::serialize, B::serialize, A::serialize, and again > > C::serialize (with a wrong this pointer - and it should not do that). > > Hmmm - why should it not do that? You may have a cycle - but > the library handles that. Seems unrelated to the other problem. > > > Maybe my second problem depends on the first one. I hope that my > > report can be of help. > > > > Thanks in advance for your answers, > > And thanks for your useful information. > > > Martin Lederhilger > Hello Robert, On your suggestion I have run a few tests. I hope they help: I commented out the registration macro associated to the base class in ExportDll.dll: - //BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT_IMPLEMENT(polymorphic_base) To make the example more realistic I modified the inheritance hierarchy as follows: class polymorphic_base{}; class polymorphic_derived1 : public polymorphic_base{}; class polymorphic_derived2 : public polymorphic_derived1{}; I added one integer data member to polymorphic_derived1 and polymorphic_derived2. Here are the results: ================================================== Polymorphic serialization through a pointer to polymorphic_base WORKS AS EXPECTED: // Save code ----------------------------- polymorphic_base *rb0 = new polymorphic_derived1(100); polymorphic_base *rb1 = new polymorphic_derived1(10); polymorphic_base *rb2 = new polymorphic_derived2(10,20); oa << BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(rb0); oa << BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(rb1); oa << BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(rb2); // Load code ----------------------------- polymorphic_base *rb0 = NULL; polymorphic_base *rb1 = NULL; polymorphic_base *rb2 = NULL; ia >> BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(rb0); ia >> BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(rb1); ia >> BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(rb2); The serialized content is presented below: - for polymorphic_xml_[io]archive <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?> <!DOCTYPE boost_serialization> <boost_serialization signature="serialization::archive" version="7"> <rb0 class_id="1" class_name="polymorphic_derived1" tracking_level="1" version="0" object_id="_0"> <polymorphic_base class_id="0" tracking_level="0" version="0"></polymorphic_base> <m_d1_>100</m_d1_> </rb0> <rb1 class_id_reference="1" object_id="_1"> <polymorphic_base></polymorphic_base> <m_d1_>10</m_d1_> </rb1> <rb2 class_id="2" class_name="polymorphic_derived2" tracking_level="1" version="0" object_id="_2"> <polymorphic_derived1 object_id="_3"> <polymorphic_base></polymorphic_base> <m_d1_>20</m_d1_> </polymorphic_derived1> <m_d2_>10</m_d2_> </rb2> </boost_serialization> - for polymorphic_text_[io]archive 22 serialization::archive 7 1 20 polymorphic_derived1 1 0 0 0 0 100 1 1 10 2 20 polymorphic_derived2 1 0 2 3 20 10 ================================================== Polymorphic serialization through a pointer to polymorphic_derived1 (i.e. the class in the middle of the hierarchy) FAILS WITH THE SAME EXCEPTION thrown about multiple registration (see the beginning of this thread). ================================================== What is worrisome though, isomorphic serialization of polymorphic_derived1 as an object followed by polymorphic serialization through a pointer to the base class FAILS WITH ACCESS VIOLATION: // Save code ----------------------------- polymorphic_derived1 rb0(100); polymorphic_base *rb1 = new polymorphic_derived1(10); polymorphic_base *rb2 = new polymorphic_derived2(10,20); oa << BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(rb0); oa << BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(rb1); oa << BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(rb2); // Load code ----------------------------- polymorphic_derived1 rb0; polymorphic_base *rb1 = NULL; polymorphic_base *rb2 = NULL; ia >> BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(rb0); ia >> BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(rb1); ia >> BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(rb2); The code above fails in basic_iarchive.cpp(line 469) with access violation (bpis is 0). if(! tracking){ bpis_ptr->load_object_ptr(ar, t, co.file_version); } The serialized content is presented below: - using polymorphic_xml_[io]archive <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?> <!DOCTYPE boost_serialization> <boost_serialization signature="serialization::archive" version="7"> <rb0 class_id="0" tracking_level="0" version="0"> <polymorphic_base class_id="1" tracking_level="0" version="0"></polymorphic_base> <m_d1_>100</m_d1_> </rb0> <rb1 class_id_reference="0" object_id="_0"> <polymorphic_base></polymorphic_base> <m_d1_>10</m_d1_> </rb1> <rb2 class_id="2" class_name="polymorphic_derived2" tracking_level="1" version="0" object_id="_1"> <polymorphic_derived1 object_id="_2"> <polymorphic_base></polymorphic_base> <m_d1_>20</m_d1_> </polymorphic_derived1> <m_d2_>10</m_d2_> </rb2> </boost_serialization> - using polymorphic_text_[io]archive 22 serialization::archive 7 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 10 2 20 polymorphic_derived2 1 0 1 2 20 10 ================================================== Isomorphic serialization of a class not related to the hierarchy as an object followed by polymorphic serialization through a pointer to the base class WORKS AS EXPECTED. ================================================== I am looking forward to hearing your conclusions. Thank you, Bogdan

2 1